A utility rebate is not verified by finding a dollar amount in a search result. ClearTrade checks the official program, who can apply, what equipment qualifies, when approval is needed and whether the program is accepting eligible projects.
Our role is to describe supported terms and identify uncertainty. The program administrator decides eligibility and payment. An article is not an award, a reservation of funds or permission to begin work.
Start with the program administrator
Our starting point is the current page maintained by the utility, agency or administrator responsible for the incentive. We then check the linked requirements and application instructions needed to support the claim.
A retailer advertisement, contractor estimate or older article can lead us to a program. It does not settle the current terms. An application PDF also needs context: we check whether the current program page still links to it and whether its dates agree.
A clear source record includes the program name, administrator, URL, date checked and conditions attached to any reported amount. If we cannot establish a condition, we identify it as unresolved rather than filling the gap with an assumption.
Check the conditions with the amount
| Verification item | Question that must be answered |
|---|---|
| Customer and service | Which utility account, service territory and customer class qualify? |
| Existing conditions | Does eligibility depend on current heating fuel or equipment? |
| Applicant and building | Are there income, ownership, property-type or occupancy restrictions? |
| New equipment | Which exact models, certifications or performance criteria apply? |
| Installer | Must the work use a specified network or approved contractor? |
| Approval and timing | What must happen before purchase, installation or application? |
| Other incentives | Can awards combine, and are there cost or funding limits? |
| Current availability | Is the program open, waiting for launch, paused or subject to another unresolved condition? |
This is the checklist we use for editorial verification. It does not imply that every program imposes every condition. Where a condition does not apply, the record should say so; where evidence is missing, it should remain unresolved.
Example: a conditional heat-pump rebate
As checked October 26, 2026, PSE’s moderate-income fuel-switching heat-pump page advertises $4,000. The page ties eligibility to conditions including qualifying income, a current single-family residential PSE natural-gas account, existing PSE gas heating, qualifying equipment and installation by a PSE Trade Ally or REP contractor. PSE program requirements
That supports reporting a conditional program—not saying that every Washington homeowner can get $4,000 for a heat pump.
For a particular household, the next step is to check the complete current requirements with the administrator and proposed installer. Being in a broad geographic area is not the same as having the required utility service or existing system.
This is a documentation example, not a contractor recommendation, product endorsement or promise of savings.
Keep similarly named programs separate
On the same check date, Washington Commerce’s federal HOMES/HARP page showed program-operation preparation and stated that purchases and work must follow rebate approval. It directed readers to the separate state HEAR program as already operating. Federal program status and approval timing
The state’s HEAR page describes delivery through local administrators and explains that coverage depends on those arrangements. State HEAR program
We therefore do not treat a statewide announcement as proof that a particular household can apply immediately. Nor do we transfer the terms of one similarly named program to another.
The reader needs the exact program and administrator for the project. If that cannot be identified, the article should not present a rebate as available to that reader.
Resolve conflicts before making a stronger claim
When a current page, an application and an older announcement disagree, we record the discrepancy. We do not quietly choose the largest award, longest deadline or least restrictive condition.
For reporting, there are three useful outcomes:
- Supported: The official evidence supports the stated claim and its conditions.
- Conditional: The program exists, but a specific eligibility or availability question remains.
- Unresolved: The available evidence conflicts or is insufficient for the proposed claim.
For example, the PSE page checked on October 26, 2026 also links generally to possible federal tax credits. We verify that separate claim against the current IRS Form 5695 instructions, which terminate new qualifying home-energy expenditures after December 31, 2025. A utility rebate page does not establish eligibility for a federal credit.
These are editorial evidence descriptions, not administrator decisions. A program may be real while a particular customer’s eligibility remains conditional.
If clarification requires contacting an administrator, we can identify the question without claiming that contact occurred. An unanswered question should remain visible in the research record.
Date the information and recheck at the decision
A check date tells readers when the evidence was reviewed. It does not guarantee that the program is unchanged today. Before purchase or installation, return to the administrator’s current terms and confirm any required approval.
For ClearTrade, a reported rule change, broken program link, changed application, closure notice or reader correction is a reason to revisit the relevant claim. We should not carry a stale incentive into a new article simply because it appeared in a previous one.
Where a program cannot be verified, an article can still explain the project itself. The equipment or scope recommendation should remain useful without assuming a rebate will be paid.
Next step: Before accepting a proposal that subtracts an incentive from the total, ask for the exact program link, qualifying equipment, approval requirements and who is responsible if the award is unavailable. Keep the contract price and a conditional incentive distinct.
Frequently asked questions
Does a rebate mentioned in an article mean I qualify?
No. Eligibility depends on the program’s current rules and your project. The administrator makes that determination.
Can I buy the equipment first and apply afterward?
Do not assume so. Check the exact program’s approval and purchase timing before committing.
Can two rebates always be combined?
No universal rule applies. Check each program’s combination rules and any limits on the same project costs.
Is a checked date a guarantee the program is still open?
No. It identifies when the source was reviewed. Confirm current availability with the administrator before relying on it.
Sources and scope
PSE moderate-income fuel-switching heat-pump requirements; Washington Commerce federal HOMES/HARP and state HEAR pages. Checked October 26, 2026. This article explains ClearTrade’s verification method using dated examples. No application was submitted and no eligibility decision or funding reservation was obtained.
For the current federal distinction, see home-electrification incentives in 2026.
For a commercial charging project, define the operating scope before counting on an incentive: see commercial EV charging operations planning.
AI tools assisted with drafting. ClearTrade Report Editorial Team checked the cited sources and edited this guide. No hands-on inspection or testing was performed.
Need a qualified professional?
Trusted Pros uses visible license-verification states and never ranks paid listings above unpaid listings.